The Info Beat

Share this post

Inside Wikipedia’s Historic, Fiercely Contested “Election”

www.theinfobeat.com

Discover more from The Info Beat

Notes on AI, law, and Wikipedia by independent journalist and attorney Stephen Harrison.
Continue reading
Sign in
Wikipedia

Inside Wikipedia’s Historic, Fiercely Contested “Election”

Wikipedia desperately needs more unpaid volunteer administrators. But who would want to go through this experience?

Stephen Harrison
Jun 16, 2022
1
Share this post

Inside Wikipedia’s Historic, Fiercely Contested “Election”

www.theinfobeat.com
Share

Welcome to Source Notes, a Future Tense column about the internet’s information ecosystem.

In April, programmer named Tamzin Hadasa Kelly ran for the unpaid, strictly volunteer position of Wikipedia administrator. Kelly, whose username is Tamzin, has contributed more than 34,000 edits to the site since registering her account in 2012. During her career, she has built up a substantial catalog of work, including Wikipedia articles about admiralty law and one for journalists killed during the Russo-Ukrainian war—a page that, sadly, has been growing.

Despite Tamzin’s decade-plus experience on the site, her request for adminship, or RfA, was close and bitterly contested as editors fiercely debated whether a comment Tamzin had made about a hypothetical Trump supporter disqualified her from the position. RfA is essentially a week of heavy vetting by the relatively small but reliably opinionated group that comprises Wikipedia’s core editor base. In order to successfully clear RfA without facing additional hurdles, the candidate must demonstrate that they are publicly supported by at least 75 percent of the editors involved during the seven-day community review period. At the end of Tamzin’s review, the site’s bureaucrats found that she had achieved 75.3 percent support from the more than 450 editors who opined. For reference, the successful RfAs in 2021 had only about 214 editors weigh in on average, meaning Tamzin’s RfA was roughly double the norm. By Wikipedia’s standards, both sides totally rocked the “vote.” (Quotes intentional; more on that later.) Each camp in Tamzin’s record-breaking RfA said that it was trying to uphold the core Wikipedia value of neutrality—but they couldn’t agree on what that meant in practice here.

Continue Reading

In other news… The Inkshares team and I are making steady progress on my forthcoming book Infodemic. Remember that you can preorder your copy here to support.

Best,
Stephen

Twitter avatar for @harrisonstephen
Stephen Harrison @harrisonstephen
Thanks to Slate for letting me write the story like this. For a few years, there've been headlines like “The Culture War is Coming for Wikipedia"... Catchy, but dead wrong. Wikipedia has been part of cultural convos/battles since its founding in 2001. 1/2
slate.comInside Wikipedia’s Historic, Fiercely Contested “Election”An administrator candidate spoke out against Trump voters, and then all Wikipedia hell broke loose.
4:03 PM ∙ Jun 16, 2022

1
Share this post

Inside Wikipedia’s Historic, Fiercely Contested “Election”

www.theinfobeat.com
Share
Comments
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Stephen Harrison
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing